Celbridge Science

Platform, practice, and implementation — one accountable partner.

Celbridge replaces the fragmented mix of consultants, spreadsheets, and point audits most organizations already run for AI governance — not another compliance tool stacked on top. Software alone cannot set an evidentiary bar, and advice alone cannot enforce one; Celbridge engagements pair the Trust Platform with senior methodological judgment, delivered inside your environment.

Advisors reviewing a printed evidence dossier in a boardroom

8 weeks · fixed scope

8-Week Trust Pilot

One consequential AI system taken through the full evidence chain: bounded claim, independent validation assessment, first Trust Record, and a decision-utility baseline. The pilot fee is fully credited against a first-year platform license.

  • Bounded Context of Use a study can be designed around
  • First Celbridge Trust Record™ with deployment gate configured
  • Decision utility scorecard and executive briefing

3–4 weeks

ISO/IEC 42001 Readiness Assessment

A focused assessment of your AI Management System against ISO/IEC 42001 requirements, translated into a practical governance roadmap: readiness scorecard, prioritized gap register, and a target-state operating model.

  • Executive readiness scorecard with clause-aligned gap assessment
  • Prioritized 30/60/90+ day remediation roadmap
  • Certification-readiness recommendation and next-step plan

Scoped per engagement

Custom Implementation

The platform deployed in your VPC or on private infrastructure, integrated with your identity provider, data systems, and governance structures — with validation programs and oversight roles designed alongside it.

  • Private/VPC platform deployment — you own the infrastructure and the data
  • SSO/SCIM identity, connector, and data-system integration
  • Governance operating model: roles, gates, and escalation protocols

Annual · added to license

Continuous Assurance & Managed Operations

Assurance operated as a standing service: drift reviews, vendor-change triage, revalidation scheduling, and monthly evidence-backed operating reviews. Recommendations never auto-apply — every change passes through a human-approved change request.

  • Active drift and change monitoring with revalidation triggers
  • Monthly generated operating reviews with evidence links
  • Quarterly executive credibility and risk briefings

How an engagement works

Each stage earns the next. We do not demonstrate the platform until a decision important enough to assess has been identified.

01

20 minutes

Scoping conversation

Name the system, the decision it influences, and the unresolved evidence question. No named decision means no proposal.

Gate: A specific system, a specific decision, and an unresolved evidence question are named. Nothing else advances.

02

Fixed scope

8-Week Trust Pilot

One consequential model or method taken through the full evidence chain — bounded claim, independent assessment, first Trust Record, value baseline.

Gate: The Trust Record and value baseline must stand up to your own reviewers before any license conversation begins.

03

Annual

Portfolio license

The Trust Platform deployed in your VPC, priced to governed volume — models and systems under governance, not seats. The pilot fee is fully credited.

Gate: Expansion happens at your pace. The full pilot fee is credited against the first-year license.

04

Standing

Continuous assurance

Drift review, change triage, revalidation scheduling, and monthly evidence-backed operating reviews.

Gate: Continues only while the monthly operating review shows assurance value against the pilot baseline.

A pilot is proposed only when four conditions are true.

“No named decision means no proposal.”

One identifiable system

A named AI model, computational method, NAM, platform output, or externally sourced tool that can be assessed within a bounded scope.

One consequential decision

The system influences candidate selection, safety, dosing, patient eligibility, regulatory evidence, partnership, or program continuation.

One unresolved evidence question

Evidence adequacy, comparator choice, reproducibility, applicability, oversight, drift, or revalidation is uncertain or contested.

One sponsor with timing

An accountable owner with a milestone, submission, partnership, or governance deadline — and a plausible funding path.

Portrait of Patrick R. Hogan, DHA

Your scoping conversation is with

Patrick R. Hogan, DHA

Co-Founder, President & CEO · Leads Celbridge's role as an NIH Complement-ARIE performer; ran enterprise AI governance across a 180-tool health-system portfolio; published the non-compensatory evidence framework the Trust Platform operationalizes.

A system to run it. A practice that knows how.

True assurance requires both the software platform to maintain the evidence chain and the senior methodological judgment to challenge assumptions.

What the platform maintains

  • Structured Context of Use records, authored not filed
  • Evidence captured against the claim, versioned and auditable
  • Trust Records issued, re-issued, and traceable to raw evidence
  • Deployment gates, human oversight assignment, and change control
  • Drift detection and revalidation triggers running continuously
  • Decision utility measured against an empirical baseline set at the start

What the practice judges

  • Writing a Context of Use narrow enough to design a definitive study around
  • Deciding whether a comparator is defensible or merely available
  • Setting the evidence bar the specific clinical or scientific decision actually requires
  • Reading a credibility package the way an FDA or EMA reviewer will read it
  • Standing up institutional governance roles, gates, and escalation protocols
  • Saying 'not yet' when the empirical evidence does not support the claim

Begin with a discovery conversation.

Twenty minutes to identify the system, the decision it influences, and the evidence question worth answering. No platform demonstration until the decision is named.

or write to [email protected]

Prefer to see the work first? Walk through an eight-week pilot, step by step